Conference proceedings article
Mid-term effects of different handling treatments on heart rate and heart rate variability of dairy cows
Publication Details
Authors: | Ivemeyer, S.; Boll, M.; Knierim, U. |
Editor: | Dwyer,Cathy; Haskell, Marie; Sandilands, Victoria |
Publisher: | 12.-15.07.2016 |
Place: | Edinburgh, United Kingdom |
Publication year: | 2016 |
Pages range : | 334 |
Book title: | Proceedings of the 50th Congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology |
ISBN: | 978-90-8686-287-0 |
eISBN: | 978-90-8686-833-9 |
While there is evidence that positive handling may improve health and performance, not
much is known about the direct and mid-term effects (about one hour later) of the quality of
short-term handling on the cows, e.g. in terms of cardiac responses. We therefore exposed six
multiparous cows after morning milking to four standardized handling procedures, one per day
in random order: positive (POS): TTouch© (PT) and stroking (PS) for each 10 min; negative
(NEG): tail lifting (4 times within 10 min, NT) and individual isolation (data from minute 5-10
of isolation, NI), in order to assess their effects on heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability
(HRV) during the tests and during the following lying bouts (52±19 min after treatment start).
To compare the post-treatment response of POS and NEG with a relaxed, but neutral situation,
a lying reference recording from an earlier day before the start of the treatments at the same
time of day was used (NEUTRAL). HR and HRV data after POS and NEG were subtracted from
NEUTRAL lying data. HR and HRV data were recorded with equipment from Polar Electro™
and analyzed with Kubios 2.2 software. Analyzed sequences were 5 min each. If possible, three
successive 5-min sequences were averaged for the lying recordings. General mixed models with
repeated measures within cows and treatments as fixed factor (either separately or summarized
to POS and NEG) were calculated for HR and HRV (standard deviation of inter-beat intervals
(SDNN), root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD), ratio low to high frequency band
powers (LF/HF)) as dependent variables. The four different handling treatments had significant
effects on HR (means: PT: 66.7, PS: 68.6, NT: 71.8, NI: 74.6 bpm; P=0.002) and HRV (SDNN
means: PT: 15.2, PS: 22.2, NI: 47.8, NT: 60.2 ms; P<0.001; LF/HF means: PT: 2.4, PS: 8.2, NI:
11.1, NT: 17.5, P=0.013; RMSSD, n.s.) during treatment. The post-treatment analyses resulted
in HR being significantly increased after NEG (0.44 bpm) and decreased after POS (-1.35
bpm; P=0.006) compared to NEUTRAL, with RMSSD being lower after NEG (-0.30 ms) and
higher after POS (1.41 ms. P=0.009; for SDNN and LF/HF, n.s.). Despite the limited sample
size and the effects not being high and not consistent for all variables, results suggest that (1)
short-term handling has slight, but longer lasting effects for at least about one hour (2) POS
treatments induce a higher parasympathetic activity compared to negative and even neutral
situations. Thus, single positive events may contribute to longer lasting enhanced well-being.