Beitrag in einem Tagungsband
A User-based Comparison of Two Augmented Reality Glasses
Details zur Publikation
Autor(inn)en: | Klose, E.; Schmidt, L. |
Herausgeber: | Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) |
Verlag: | IEEE |
Verlagsort / Veröffentlichungsort: | New York |
Publikationsjahr: | 2018 |
Seitenbereich: | 1-2 |
Buchtitel: | IEEE Virtual Reality (Reutlingen 2018) |
Zusammenfassung, Abstract
We present a scenario-based laboratory study with 40 participants comparing two augmented reality (AR) glasses in a travelling scenario. In a within-subject design, the binocular Epson Moverio BT-200 and the monocular Vuzix M100 were compared with regard to performance, acceptance, workload and preference. While performance was equal with both glasses, the Epson Moverio BT-200 glasses got higher acceptance and lower workload ratings and were preferred by the majority of the participants. The findings provide knowledge on human factors in AR glasses usage.
We present a scenario-based laboratory study with 40 participants comparing two augmented reality (AR) glasses in a travelling scenario. In a within-subject design, the binocular Epson Moverio BT-200 and the monocular Vuzix M100 were compared with regard to performance, acceptance, workload and preference. While performance was equal with both glasses, the Epson Moverio BT-200 glasses got higher acceptance and lower workload ratings and were preferred by the majority of the participants. The findings provide knowledge on human factors in AR glasses usage.
